Fool Blog: An Open Letter to Somali Pirates

Recs

74

Special Offer!

Jan 12, Motley Fool Pro will accept new members for 10 days only. Your spot is reserved! To learn more, click below.

Ahoy, Somali Pirates,

Well, someone ate their Wheaties yesterday morning, eh? Word on the street is that you've hijacked yet another ship. This time, an oil tanker. But not just any ol' oil tanker, no. This one holds 2,000,000 barrels of crude oil worth roughly $112,000,000.

Also, this one belongs to Saudi Aramco.

Now, maybe I'm just unusually paranoid about trifling with mysterious corporate juggernauts after seeing Quantum of Solace last night, but I'm a bit concerned that you've bitten off more than you can chew here. I mean, really, you thought you'd hijack $112,000,000 worth of product from the crown prince of oil companies and walk away unscathed, with a handsome booty to boot? Really? Really?

See, Saudi Aramco has a reputation to protect here. As the world's largest oil company, it can't afford to be flexed on by a group of two-bit pirates. Further, while Saudi Arabia can't go off half-cocked, let's recall that this is a national oil company you're messing with, not some weak-kneed public firm like ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM), Chevron (NYSE: CVX), Royal Dutch Shell (NYSE: RDS-A) (NYSE: RDS-B), or Total (NYSE: TOT).

Unlike those puny publicly traded peers, Saudi Aramco doesn't have a roster of shareholders that includes university endowments and teachers' unions. Its owner, King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz, sports seven frigates with missile ranges up to 180 kilometers, four corvettes built by the U.S. Navy, attack boats, helicopters, and 1,200 marines.

Frankly, if it weren't for the fact that you've got a fortune of black gold under your feet, I wouldn't have been shocked to see you go down in a literal blaze of glory.

Of course, it isn't like you're without leverage here. After all, you do have around two dozen hostages from varied nationalities, not to mention that you've got a fully-loaded Saudi freighter coasting towards the pirate haven of Eyl. It is entirely possible that the Saudis could negotiate with you. And given the other option (one that involves Keyser Söze-style negotiation tactics), you'd better hope this is the route they choose.

Of course, there's always a third option, which is that they call your bluff. What would you do with 2,000,000 barrels of oil, anyway? Talk about an illiquid liquid. Unless you've got a few thousand miles of steel pipe or a couple million barrels lying around, you're probably stuck with something folks call a "stranded resource." Throw in Dennis Hopper, and we're looking at a scene straight out of Waterworld.

Anyway, don't go killing those hostages. Doing so makes it open season for bringing down the hammer on you. Plus, given that the hostages come from a range of countries, you'd risk an onslaught of undesirable attention from a host of very irked countries. Dare I say it, this brazen, foolish theft of yours might be the tipping point on the international community deciding that they're no longer going to put up with your playing pirate anymore.

One way or the other, I'm afraid some of your boys will end up walking the plank for this one. In a way, I hate to say it. After all, I do admire your gusto.

Best,
Joe "Jolly Roger" Magyer

"The most exciting development in my lifetime!" 15 years ago, Motley Fool founder David Gardner uncovered a secret that changed how he'd invest forever. It can make you money in up, down, and rollercoaster markets. To learn more, enter your email address now.

Joe Magyer owns no shares of any companies mentioned in this article. Joe's friend Brandy was born on National Talk Like a Pirate Day. Total is an Income Investor recommendation. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 18, 2008, at 10:17 AM, RHaganC wrote:

    arr matey. I love the irony. It was North African Muslim pirates who we were forced to bring down in the early 1800s b/c the power countries of Europe wouldn’t do it. A grudge is still held against the US for that action, as it sparked the downfall of the single Muslim Empire and threw a wrench in their economy built on slave trade and theft (Maybe we forget the past, but they don't. They are better for it.)

    Now, a Muslim Theocracy has to pay the piper; they will be forced to shut these yahoos down, because the US has over extended itself, and (just like 200 years ago) Europe won't do squat.

    Where's all the rum gone?

  • Report this Comment On November 20, 2008, at 3:24 AM, DaraghG wrote:

    You do indeed forget the past RHaganC! or at least reinterpret it.

    The 1st Barbary War was fought by Americans against North African Pirates. But it was so they wouldn't have to pay ransoms which every country was doing at the time.

    Europe did nothing?

    The second Barbary War involved Britain and Holland as well as America and afterwards, all of the region and almost all the world fell under European Colonial rule. Somalia was under French, Italian and British rule. So it was they who brought the region under control (not that I agree with colonialism)

    Meanwhile, slavery continued for two more generations in the US. It was the Brits who ended slave trading.

    Currently there are naval ships from many countries in the region, including American, British, Danish, German, Spanish, Turkish, Dutch, Italian, Greek, Russian, Indian, Malaysian and Canadian!

    What part of these facts make you say "(just like 200 years ago) europe won't do squat"?

    Another example of a fantasy history where America does all the heavy lifting. Please, honour the sacrifices of others, whether it be in Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan or further back during WW2.

    As for the article, I think you're right, the hammer will soon fall on these guys, but likely it will only end when there's a real government in Somalia. The piracy died down during the six months when the Islamic Courts ran the country with an iron fist.

  • Report this Comment On November 20, 2008, at 12:01 PM, sabinamv wrote:

    It took India to finally bring the pirates down!

  • Report this Comment On November 21, 2008, at 9:12 AM, swissrobinson wrote:

    Sorry Joe,

    There aint no military force sufficient to stop this little racket. Too many square miles of ocean, too many pirates at sea and too well organised. These pirates are linked to the powers that be in Mogadishu. And they're bringing in more income than the authorities are able to generate from their own population. Unfortunately, the US doesn't want the hard-line Islamic force that is present poised to take Mogadishu having control of Somalia - despite the fact that they would curb this practice.

    Nooo, this is going to require a political solution, so let's hope that Arab nations like the Saudi Kingdom can help broker a solution that allows more moderate Muslim groups to form a coalition against the Al-Qaeda lovers who presently stand to regain control of Somalia.

  • Report this Comment On November 21, 2008, at 12:05 PM, Ironbob wrote:

    Without a doubt this is one of the most ridiculous and idiotic blog postings I've ever seen. The only thing more hideously stupid are the replies.

  • Report this Comment On November 21, 2008, at 10:06 PM, Tigger590 wrote:

    Forgot Option 4, which is already in the works...

    Direct Islamic Militants to fix this little pirate problem. Pirating muslim owned property. BIG NO NO!

    We're waiting for some good YouTube pirate battles.

  • Report this Comment On November 21, 2008, at 10:57 PM, darkpoolsofs0ros wrote:

    So where is the clamor to have these ships pay tax to this country for doing commerce in its waters?

    people don't go crazy like this unless they are being taken advantage of

  • Report this Comment On November 22, 2008, at 10:49 AM, piratehunter wrote:

    I say Go Pirates, you've got a hideout here at my place!, the reason why these Shipping Companies and these oil Corporations are mad, is because they don't like the competition. The Companies are just going to pass the costs on to us and pirate our booty anyway. Lets see how many time they pay the pirates before something is really done. They will negotiate and come to terms and the pirates will give safe passage across the waters. But in the mean time the oil companies will not change the price because they will say the risk still stands. Fact is I love times like these... I love to wave at them as they pass by. GO PIRATES!!!!

  • Report this Comment On November 22, 2008, at 3:06 PM, Seafairer wrote:

    Aye, as a real Mariner, I say that the article is mostly correct, and (swissrobinson) has the right take on the situation. Also correct is the notion that America is preeminent in this situation.

  • Report this Comment On November 24, 2008, at 10:19 PM, GoNuke wrote:

    US navy provides Saudi service for a fee:

    1) seals

    2) convoys

  • Report this Comment On November 25, 2008, at 12:56 PM, TMFHelical wrote:

    Why do I have a creeping feeling that we will soon see Saudi Aramco hiring Dick Cheney as head of anti-piracy efforts?

    But yes, there is a lesson to be learned from the theft of illiquid assets, and I'm not just saying that because my efforts to sell Mt. Rushmore on Ebay were once again thwarted (and besides, no one seemed willing to pay the shipping).

  • Report this Comment On November 27, 2008, at 9:23 AM, CycoMike wrote:

    They're selling Somali Pirate t-shirts on ebay now. Is this a great country or what?

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 777891, ~/articles/articlehandler.aspx, 1/6/2009 9:21:59 PM

Sign up for FREE Motley Fool site access to keep reading:

“Fool Blog: An Open Letter to Somali Pirates”

Signing up allows you to comment on articles and on the discussion boards.

It's completely FREE and will take only 10 seconds.

Privacy / Legal Information

We will use your email address only to keep you informed about updates to our web site and about other products and services that we think might interest you. The Motley Fool respects your privacy. Please read our Privacy Statement

.

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

What Fools Are Saying

Most Recommended

Jan 6 at 4:04 PM

Market Summary

DJIA 9,015.10 +62.21 +0.69%
S&P 500 934.70 +7.25 +0.78%
NASD 1,652.38 +24.35 +1.50%
Sponsored by:

Related Tickers

Chevron Corp

CAPS Rating 4/5 Stars

$77.35

+0.69 (+0.90%)

Outperform2595

Underperform139

Rate This Stock